Access map before connection
The scope names each system, credential, permission, and person that needs access before anything is connected.
We do not use certification logos or universal security promises we cannot prove. Each build documents the data, providers, permissions, approval points, ownership, and handover that apply to that system.
These are design requirements to confirm for each deployment—not claims that every vendor or environment behaves the same way.
The scope names each system, credential, permission, and person that needs access before anything is connected.
The deployment plan prefers scoped service accounts or provider authorization that can be removed without sharing a personal password.
Customer messages, payments, record deletion, and other consequential actions can wait for a named person to approve them.
Sources, destinations, retention, model providers, and deletion responsibilities are documented for the selected system.
Where the connected tools support it, the workflow records inputs, actions, errors, approvals, and the resulting state.
Cloud, client-owned infrastructure, and local-model options are evaluated against the actual data and operating constraints.
The written control map travels with the technical scope.
What enters, where it travels, and what may be retained.
Which person, service, or model may read or change it.
Which actions stop for a named person.
Who owns credentials, workflows, exceptions, and decisions.
What the selected tools can record about a run.
That depends on the selected provider, account type, and settings. Before launch, the scope identifies every model provider and documents its applicable data-use and retention terms.
The access list is agreed for the build and support scope. We prefer named, revocable accounts and remove FollowAI access at handover or when support ends.
Handover, credential revocation, export, and deletion responsibilities are written into the project scope. What remains running depends on the accounts and infrastructure selected for the build.
Only actions explicitly included in the workflow should run automatically. Sensitive actions can be held for approval, and the boundary is reviewed before launch.
Send the requirements before access is granted. We will identify what the proposed architecture supports, what requires a different vendor or deployment, and what FollowAI cannot honestly promise.
We will map the data, providers, permissions, approval gates, ownership, and handover requirements with the workflow itself.